9
Notes
8
Accords
1
Perfumer
Touch for Men
masculine
Created by Jean-Pierre Bethouart
Touch for Men by Burberry is a Woody Floral Musk fragrance for men. Touch for Men was launched in 2000. The nose behind this fragrance is Jean-Pierre Bethouart. Top notes are Violet Leaf, Artemisia and Mandarin Orange; middle notes are White Pepper, Cedar and Nutmeg; base notes are White Musk, Tonka Bean and Vetiver.
Affordable Alternatives
View all 10 →
Fragrance Notes
Best Season
51%
Win
100%
Spr
68%
Sum
86%
Fall
Day & Night
100%
Day
55%
Night
Olfactory Pyramid
From opening to dry-down, intensity based on community voting.
Top Notes0 – 15 min
Base Notes3 h – end
Opening
Evolution
Dry-down
Top Notes0 – 15 min
Base Notes3 h – end
User Ratings
5,221 votes
4.01
Love it
1.8k34%
Like it
2.3k44%
OK
53010%
Dislike
50510%
Hate it
862%
Community Insights
PositiveBased on 45 community opinions from Reddit
7.8
/ 10 community score
Burberry Touch for Men is highly regarded by the r/fragrance community as an underrated, affordable designer fragrance with strong performance and broad appeal. While some find the powdery profile off-putting, most appreciate its clean, warm, inoffensive character that works well across various social scenarios and has excellent longevity for the price.
Strengths
- Warm, masculine, and inoffensive scent that appeals to both men and women
- Excellent performance with good longevity (6-7 hours on skin, 12+ hours on clothes)
- Affordable price point ($20-32 for 50-100ml bottles)
- Versatile and wearable for daily use, office, and various occasions
- Simple yet elegant with a comforting, nostalgic quality
Weaknesses
- Powdery and potentially baby powder-like scent that some find off-putting
- Can smell like dryer sheets or laundry to some noses
- Relatively basic and unambitious, not complex or deep
- Availability issues reported by some users in certain regions
Best for
Office wear and professional settingsDaily casual wearCold/winter monthsDate night or romantic occasions
AI-generated summary based on public community discussions. Not affiliated with the opinions' authors.
