14
Notes
8
Accords
1
Perfumer
Escada Sentiment
feminine
Created by Natalie Gracia-Cetto
Escada Sentiment by Escada is a Floral Fruity fragrance for women. Escada Sentiment was launched in 2000. The nose behind this fragrance is Natalie Gracia-Cetto. Top notes are Iris, Black Currant, Red Currant, Magnolia and Green Mandarin; middle notes are White Peach, Hiacynth, Tuberose and Orris Root; base notes are Heliotrope, Vanilla, Amber, Brazilian Rosewood and Sandalwood. Light and delicately sweet, Escada Sentiment comes in a pink bottle with a heart shaped stopper – a perfect gift for a woman you love. The composition starts with green mandarin orange, magnolia, iris, black currant and red berries. The heart is made of hyacinth, white peach and tuberose. The woody base notes are: sandalwood, palisander rosewood, heliotrope, vanilla and ambergris. The fragrance was created by Nathalie Gracia-Cetto in 2000.
Olfactory Pyramid
From opening to dry-down, intensity based on community voting.
Top Notes0 – 15 min
Heart Notes15 min – 3 h
Base Notes3 h – end
Opening
Evolution
Dry-down
Top Notes0 – 15 min
Heart Notes15 min – 3 h
Base Notes3 h – end
Community Insights
PositiveBased on 31 community opinions from Reddit
7.5
/ 10 community score
Escada Sentiment is beloved by its dedicated fan base who consider it a uniquely special fragrance worth keeping as a signature scent. The main frustration is its discontinuation and difficulty finding comparable alternatives, though bottles are still obtainable through secondary markets at elevated prices.
Strengths
- Unique and distinctive scent profile
- Highly nostalgic for former users
- Memorable signature fragrance with lasting appeal
- Still available on secondary markets despite discontinuation
Weaknesses
- Difficult to find and expensive on resale market
- Discontinued with no similar alternatives available
- Limited availability causes frustration among fans
Best for
Signature daily fragrancePersonal collection keeperNostalgic wearers
AI-generated summary based on public community discussions. Not affiliated with the opinions' authors.
