Skip to main content
Fraganty
Explore
Brands
Perfumers
Notes
Reviews
Community
Tools
Fragrance Expert
⌘
K
en
Home
/
Compare
So Sweet vs Angel
Side-by-side comparison of So Sweet by Lolita Lempicka and Angel by Mugler
Lolita Lempicka
So Sweet
2016
feminine
3.90
(512)
Accords
Sweet
100%
Fruity
99%
Musky
90%
Powdery
88%
Woody
59%
Rose
57%
Top
Raspberry
Sour Cherry
Mandarin Orange
Heart
Iris
Rose
Angelica
Base
Musk
Cashmeran
Amberwood
Best: Spring (93%)
Day (100%)
Mugler
Angel
1992
feminine
3.55
(33,725)
Accords
Sweet
100%
Patchouli
46%
Fruity
44%
Warm Spicy
44%
Caramel
42%
Vanilla
38%
Top
Cotton Candy
Coconut
Currant Leaf And Bud
Melon
Jasmine
Bergamot
Pineapple
Mandarin Orange
Heart
Honey
Red Berries
Blackberry
Plum
Apricot
Jasmine
Peach
Nutmeg
Caraway
Orchid
Rose
Lily Of The Valley
Base
Patchouli
Dark Chocolate
Caramel
Vanilla
Tonka Bean
Amber
Musk
Sandalwood
Day (0%)
Comparison Summary
Shared Notes (3)
Mandarin Orange
Rose
Musk
Unique to So Sweet (6)
Raspberry
Sour Cherry
Iris
Angelica
Cashmeran
Amberwood
Unique to Angel (24)
Cotton Candy
Coconut
Currant Leaf And Bud
Melon
Jasmine
Bergamot
Pineapple
Honey
Red Berries
Blackberry
Plum
Apricot
Peach
Nutmeg
Caraway
Orchid
Lily Of The Valley
Patchouli
Dark Chocolate
Caramel
Vanilla
Tonka Bean
Amber
Sandalwood
Shared Accords (3)
Sweet
Fruity
Woody
Attribute
So Sweet
Angel
Brand
Lolita Lempicka
Mugler
Year
2016
1992
Rating
3.90
3.55
Concentration
—
—
Gender
feminine
feminine
Total Notes
9
28