Side-by-side comparison of Pour Homme by Ted Lapidus and Polo by Ralph Lauren
Ted Lapidus
Ralph Lauren
| Attribute | Pour Homme | Polo |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ted Lapidus | Ralph Lauren |
| Year | 1978 | 1978 |
| Rating | 4.44 | 3.82 |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Gender | masculine | masculine |
| Total Notes | 15 | 21 |
63 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
6.5
/10
Pour Homme is a quirky, affordable fragrance with a devoted cult following among budget fragrance enthusiasts. While its unusual honey-pineapple-incense profile and strong performance make it a standout value purchase, its unconventional character and hefty projection mean it's best suited for adventurous wearers who appreciate its weird, animalic charm rather than mainstream appeal.
45 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
6.5
/10
The Polo line by Ralph Lauren receives mixed reviews from the r/fragrance community. While recognized as accessible entry-level fragrances with decent quality, many experienced enthusiasts find the original scents plain or generic compared to niche alternatives. Specific flankers like Polo Blue Gold Blend and Ultra Blue attract more enthusiasm, though some users actively avoid the brand due to overexposure in casual party settings.