Side-by-side comparison of Oud Minérale by Tom Ford and Fabulous by Tom Ford
Tom Ford
Tom Ford
| Attribute | Oud Minérale | Fabulous |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Tom Ford | Tom Ford |
| Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Rating | 4.07 | 3.83 |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Gender | feminine | feminine |
| Total Notes | 0 | 11 |
33 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
7.8
/10
Oud Minérale is generally well-regarded by the community as a unique, mature fragrance with an appealing aquatic-woody profile that performs best on skin. However, it's not universally loved, and some find the mineral freshness off-putting or the scent difficult to pair with others. Recent availability issues and reformulation concerns have frustrated dedicated fans.
91 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
6.2
/10
The community is divided on Fabulous, with the actual fragrance receiving moderate appreciation for its quality and unique almond-leather profile, but significant criticism for its high price point and polarizing scent character. Much of the negativity stems from Tom Ford's controversial marketing strategy and the fragrance's divisive name rather than the scent itself, making it a classic case of marketing overshadowing product merit.