Side-by-side comparison of Lolita Lempicka by Lolita Lempicka and Angel by Mugler
Lolita Lempicka
Mugler
| Attribute | Lolita Lempicka | Angel |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Lolita Lempicka | Mugler |
| Year | 1997 | 1992 |
| Rating | 3.97 | 3.55 |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Gender | feminine | feminine |
| Total Notes | 13 | 28 |
30 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
5.5
/10
The community acknowledges Lolita Lempicka as a beloved discontinued classic, but the new reformulations are widely viewed as hollow shadows of the original. Multiple comparisons confirm the new version lacks the rich, dark anise and tonka backbone that gave the original its soul, with reformulation driven by IFRA regulations and EU bans (particularly Lilial). While some new wearers find the current version acceptable, those familiar with the original consistently report the fragrance feels weaker, brighter, and less complex.
49 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
5.5
/10
Angel is a polarizing fragrance with a devoted following for its original formula, but the current reformulation disappoints many fans. While some appreciate the sweeter variants like Angel Nova, others find the modern version overly peppery, harsh, and patchouli-forward compared to the beloved original.