What's the difference between DNA for Men 2004 and London for Men?+
DNA for Men 2004 is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Bijan (2004) dominated by Lavender accords. London for Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Burberry (2006) leaning on Tobacco accords. They share 3 accords: Lavender, Woody, Sweet.
Which is better, DNA for Men 2004 or London for Men?+
By community rating, DNA for Men 2004 scores 4.33/5 vs London for Men at 4.25/5. London for Men's standout strength: Pleasant warm spicy scent with tobacco and pine notes reminiscent of Christmas. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do DNA for Men 2004 and London for Men smell similar?+
They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. London for Men: The r/fragrance community appreciates Burberry London for Men's pleasant seasonal scent and affordable price, but consistently reports disappointing longevity of only 2-4 hours on skin.
Which lasts longer, DNA for Men 2004 or London for Men?+
London for Men: Poor longevity and projection, lasting only 2-4 hours on skin Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits DNA for Men 2004 vs London for Men?+
DNA for Men 2004 scores highest for spring wear; London for Men scores highest for winter wear. DNA for Men 2004 leans evening, London for Men leans evening.
