Side-by-side comparison of Central Park by Bond No 9 and Coco Mademoiselle by Chanel
Bond No 9
Chanel
| Attribute | Central Park | Coco Mademoiselle |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Bond No 9 | Chanel |
| Year | 2004 | 2001 |
| Rating | 4.00 | 4.11 |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Gender | feminine | feminine |
| Total Notes | 12 | 14 |
47 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
6.5
/10
Central Park by Bond No. 9 generates mixed community reactions, primarily praised for nostalgic fruity-floral qualities and layering potential, but criticized for tacky packaging and an overwhelming girlish scent profile on its own. The fragrance appeals most to those seeking childhood scent memories, though many feel the bottle design doesn't justify the luxury price point.
67 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
8.2
/10
The r/fragrance community overwhelmingly rejects age-based fragrance gatekeeping and celebrates Coco Mademoiselle as an ageless, timeless scent appropriate for anyone regardless of age. Users emphasize that personal preference trumps outdated rules, though some acknowledge the fragrance has a sophisticated, feminine character that works particularly well for work and formal occasions.