Side-by-side comparison of A*Men by Mugler and London for Men by Burberry
Mugler
Burberry
| Attribute | A*Men | London for Men |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mugler | Burberry |
| Year | 1996 | 2006 |
| Rating | 4.02 | 4.25 |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Gender | masculine | masculine |
| Total Notes | 21 | 9 |
47 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
6.5
/10
The A*Men line generates divided opinions, with the original formulation and Pure Havane flanker highly regarded, while recent releases like Stellar and Ultimate disappoint long-time fans. Community consensus indicates the line excels for evening wear in cooler seasons but struggles with versatility and summer compatibility, with notable quality decline in newer releases compared to vintage versions.
56 opinions · Source: r/fragrance community
6.5
/10
The r/fragrance community appreciates Burberry London for Men's pleasant seasonal scent and affordable price, but consistently reports disappointing longevity of only 2-4 hours on skin. While the fragrance is well-regarded for its warm spices and holiday appeal, the weak performance is a significant drawback that many users accept only because of the low cost and ease of reapplication.