Skip to main content
Fraganty
Explore
Brands
Perfumers
Notes
Reviews
Community
Tools
Fragrance Expert
⌘
K
en
Home
/
Compare
1960 vs Lalique Pour Homme Equus
Side-by-side comparison of 1960 by Bogner and Lalique Pour Homme Equus by Lalique
Bogner
1960
2012
masculine
4.20
(5)
Accords
Citrus
100%
Fresh Spicy
59%
Amber
20%
Warm Spicy
20%
Woody
19%
Conifer
18%
Top
Lime
Mandarin Orange
Mint
Heart
Nutmeg
Cardamom
Lavender
Base
Amber
Oakmoss
Vanilla
Cedar
Best: Spring (100%)
Day (0%)
Lalique
Lalique Pour Homme Equus
2001
masculine
4.27
(2,709)
Accords
Woody
100%
Aromatic
86%
Fresh Spicy
61%
Warm Spicy
42%
Citrus
42%
Earthy
18%
Top
Bergamot
Lemon
Citron
Heart
Juniper
Cardamom
Violet Leaf
Nutmeg
Mahogany
Mace
Base
Sequoia
Vetiver
Leather
Benzoin
Amyris
Musk
Best: Spring (98%)
Day (100%)
Comparison Summary
Shared Notes (2)
Nutmeg
Cardamom
Unique to 1960 (8)
Lime
Mandarin Orange
Mint
Lavender
Amber
Oakmoss
Vanilla
Cedar
Unique to Lalique Pour Homme Equus (13)
Bergamot
Lemon
Citron
Juniper
Violet Leaf
Mahogany
Mace
Sequoia
Vetiver
Leather
Benzoin
Amyris
Musk
Shared Accords (5)
Citrus
Fresh Spicy
Warm Spicy
Woody
Aromatic
Attribute
1960
Lalique Pour Homme Equus
Brand
Bogner
Lalique
Year
2012
2001
Rating
4.20
4.27
Concentration
—
—
Gender
masculine
masculine
Total Notes
10
15