What's the difference between 1953 Pour Homme and Back to Black?+
1953 Pour Homme is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Pell Wall Perfumes (2013) dominated by Amber accords. Back to Black is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from By Kilian (2009) leaning on Sweet accords. They share 3 accords: Amber, Warm Spicy, Vanilla.
Which is better, 1953 Pour Homme or Back to Black?+
By community rating, 1953 Pour Homme scores 3.75/5 vs Back to Black at 4.01/5. Back to Black's standout strength: Beautiful, prominent honey note that's less overwhelming than competitors. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do 1953 Pour Homme and Back to Black smell similar?+
They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Back to Black: The r/fragrance community views Back to Black as a well-executed honey fragrance that successfully balances richness with wearability.
Which lasts longer, 1953 Pour Homme or Back to Black?+
Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits 1953 Pour Homme vs Back to Black?+
1953 Pour Homme scores highest for spring wear; Back to Black scores highest for winter wear. 1953 Pour Homme leans daytime, Back to Black leans evening.
