16
Noten
8
Akkoorden
1
Parfumeur
Lalique Pour Homme
Heren
Gemaakt door Maurice Roucel
Lalique Pour Homme by Lalique is a Woody Aromatic fragrance for men. Lalique Pour Homme was launched in 1997. The nose behind this fragrance is Maurice Roucel. Top notes are Lavender, Rosemary, Bergamot, Grapefruit, Pomelo, Mandarin Orange and Tangerine; middle notes are Cedar, Iris, Lily-of-the-Valley and Jasmine; base notes are Oakmoss, Sandalwood, Vanilla, Patchouli and Amber.
Geurnoten
Beste seizoen
76%
Win
92%
Len
44%
Zom
100%
Her
Dag & Nacht
97%
Dag
61%
Nacht
Olfactorische piramide
Van opening tot basis, intensiteit gebaseerd op stemmen van de community.
Topnoten0 – 15 min
Hartnoten15 min – 3 u
Basisnoten3 u – einde
Opening
Ontwikkeling
Droogfase
Topnoten0 – 15 min
Hartnoten15 min – 3 u
Basisnoten3 u – einde
Gebruikersbeoordelingen
3,320 stemmen
4.08
Geweldig
1.3k39%
Lekker
1.4k42%
Oké
2467%
Niet lekker
33110%
Verschrikkelijk
431%
Community Insights
MixedBased on 20 community opinions from Reddit
6.5
/ 10 community score
Lalique Pour Homme Lion is a solid, clean fragrance that offers good value at its price point, particularly appealing for summer wear and layering. However, the community consensus suggests it lacks the distinctiveness and longevity to become a standout signature scent, with many wearers finding themselves reaching for it infrequently despite acknowledging its quality.
Strengths
- Crisp, clean scent profile with versatile appeal
- Good value for money at ~$25 price point
- Effective layering capabilities with other fragrances
- Smooth EDP concentration with balanced vanilla and iris notes
Weaknesses
- Lacks distinctive character compared to premium alternatives like Creed
- Can be easily overlooked in a collection despite quality
- Limited availability makes blind buying risky
- Doesn't stand out enough to become a signature scent for many wearers
Best for
Summer and warm weather wearOffice and professional settingsEveryday casual layeringSpring and fall versatile use
AI-generated summary based on public community discussions. Not affiliated with the opinions' authors.
