Vergelijking van Vibrant Leather van Zara en Acqua di Gio van Giorgio Armani naast elkaar
Zara
Giorgio Armani
| Eigenschap | Vibrant Leather | Acqua di Gio |
|---|---|---|
| Merk | Zara | Giorgio Armani |
| Jaar | 2016 | 1996 |
| Beoordeling | 4.15 | 4.12 |
| Concentratie | — | — |
| Geslacht | masculine | masculine |
| Totaal noten | 5 | 25 |
22 meningen · Bron: r/fragrance community
6.5
/10
Vibrant Leather is praised by the community as an excellent budget fragrance with an appealing citrus-woody smell, but opinions diverge sharply on performance. While some users experience all-day wear, many report poor longevity (1-2 hours) and minimal projection, making it better suited for subtle, close-to-skin wear rather than a statement fragrance. At its low price point, it offers decent value for daily casual use, though competitors offer superior performance for marginally more cost.
52 meningen · Bron: r/fragrance community
7.8
/10
The r/fragrance community views Acqua di Gio as a classic, well-regarded fragrance with fresh and clean characteristics that appeal to both men and women. While the original is beloved for its versatility, flanker versions (especially Absolu) are polarizing, with some praising their unique qualities while others find them harsh or unnecessarily different from the original DNA. Performance is consistently noted as a strength of the reformulations.