Vergelijking van Sweet van Lolita Lempicka en Angel van Mugler naast elkaar
Lolita Lempicka
Mugler
| Eigenschap | Sweet | Angel |
|---|---|---|
| Merk | Lolita Lempicka | Mugler |
| Jaar | 2014 | 1992 |
| Beoordeling | 3.85 | 3.55 |
| Concentratie | — | — |
| Geslacht | feminine | feminine |
| Totaal noten | 7 | 28 |
66 meningen · Bron: r/fragrance community
7.5
/10
Sweet by Lolita Lempicka receives mixed but generally positive reception from the community. While praised for its beautiful vintage bottle, strong performance, and appeal to 90s floral lovers, the peach note is divisive—some appreciate it while others find it stale or musty on their skin. The fragrance is noted as having an excellent opening that deteriorates in the drydown, making it better suited for classic fragrance collectors rather than pure gourmand fans.
49 meningen · Bron: r/fragrance community
5.5
/10
Angel is a polarizing fragrance with a devoted following for its original formula, but the current reformulation disappoints many fans. While some appreciate the sweeter variants like Angel Nova, others find the modern version overly peppery, harsh, and patchouli-forward compared to the beloved original.