Spark for Men vs Polo

Порівняння Spark for Men від Liz Claiborne та Polo від Ralph Lauren пліч-о-пліч

Liz Claiborne

2003masculine

4.09(188)

Акорди

Ralph Lauren

1978masculine

3.82(6,660)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (3)

ДеревнийСвіжий прянийАроматичний

Властивість	Spark for Men	Polo
Бренд	Liz Claiborne	Ralph Lauren
Рік	2003	1978
Оцінка	4.09	3.82
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	masculine	masculine
Усього нот	8	21

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Spark for Men and Polo?+

Spark for Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Liz Claiborne (2003) dominated by Warm Spicy accords. Polo is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Ralph Lauren (1978) leaning on Woody accords. They share 3 accords: Woody, Fresh Spicy, Aromatic.

Which is better, Spark for Men or Polo?+

By community rating, Spark for Men scores 4.09/5 vs Polo at 3.82/5. Polo's standout strength: Good starter fragrance option. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Spark for Men and Polo smell similar?+

They share 2 notes and 3 accords, including Woody, Fresh Spicy, Aromatic, Pepper, Amber. Polo: The Polo line by Ralph Lauren receives mixed reviews from the r/fragrance community.

Which lasts longer, Spark for Men or Polo?+

Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Spark for Men vs Polo?+

Spark for Men scores highest for winter wear; Polo scores highest for winter wear. Spark for Men leans evening, Polo leans daytime.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Polo

Змішаний

45 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.5

/10

The Polo line by Ralph Lauren receives mixed reviews from the r/fragrance community. While recognized as accessible entry-level fragrances with decent quality, many experienced enthusiasts find the original scents plain or generic compared to niche alternatives. Specific flankers like Polo Blue Gold Blend and Ultra Blue attract more enthusiasm, though some users actively avoid the brand due to overexposure in casual party settings.

Позитивний

Good starter fragrance option
Affordable and accessible in stores
Some flankers like Gold Blend and Ultra Blue have loyal fans

Негативний

Original Polo Blue considered plain or underwhelming by many
Overexposed due to popularity in casual settings
Often outperformed by competing brands like Acqua di Gio

Spark for Men vs Polo

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні ноти (2)

Унікальні для Spark for Men (6)

Унікальні для Polo (19)

Спільні акорди (3)

Часті запитання

Позитивний

Негативний