Rumba vs LouLou

Порівняння Rumba від Ted Lapidus та LouLou від Cacharel пліч-о-пліч

Ted Lapidus

1989feminine

3.76(1,087)

Акорди

Cacharel

1987feminine

3.81(10,619)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні ноти (7)

Слива Цвіт апельсина Геліотроп Жасмин Сандал Мускус Ваніль

Спільні акорди (5)

СолодкийФруктовийБілоквітковийДеревнийБурштиновий

Властивість	Rumba	LouLou
Бренд	Ted Lapidus	Cacharel
Рік	1989	1987
Оцінка	3.76	3.81
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	29	19

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Rumba and LouLou?+

Rumba is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Ted Lapidus (1989) dominated by Sweet accords. LouLou is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Cacharel (1987) leaning on Powdery accords. They share 5 accords: Sweet, Fruity, White Floral, Woody.

Which is better, Rumba or LouLou?+

By community rating, Rumba scores 3.76/5 vs LouLou at 3.81/5. LouLou's standout strength: Similar to Poison but more affordable alternative. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Rumba and LouLou smell similar?+

They share 7 notes and 5 accords, including Sweet, Fruity, White Floral, Woody, Amber. LouLou: LouLou is viewed as a classic vintage fragrance that holds emotional significance for many, particularly those who associate it with mothers and family memories.

Which lasts longer, Rumba or LouLou?+

Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Rumba vs LouLou?+

Rumba scores highest for winter wear; LouLou scores highest for winter wear. Rumba leans evening, LouLou leans evening.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — LouLou

Змішаний

76 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.5

/10

LouLou is viewed as a classic vintage fragrance that holds emotional significance for many, particularly those who associate it with mothers and family memories. While it serves as a more affordable alternative to Poison with similar characteristics, the modern reformulation is reportedly quite different from the original version, which some collectors find disappointing.

Позитивний

Similar to Poison but more affordable alternative
Nostalgic and emotionally meaningful for many wearers
Classic vintage fragrance with loyal fanbase

Негативний

Modern reformulation is significantly different from original vintage version
Sharper and less smooth than Poison
Not mentioned negatively often but lacks modern popularity