Roses, Roses vs Passion

Порівняння Roses, Roses від Avon та Passion від Elizabeth Taylor пліч-о-пліч

Avon

1972feminine

4.31(70)

Акорди

Elizabeth Taylor

1988feminine

3.87(2,040)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (3)

МускуснийПудровийАнімалістичний

Властивість	Roses, Roses	Passion
Бренд	Avon	Elizabeth Taylor
Рік	1972	1988
Оцінка	4.31	3.87
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	0	26

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Roses, Roses and Passion?+

Roses, Roses is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Avon (1972) dominated by Rose accords. Passion is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Elizabeth Taylor (1988) leaning on Woody accords. They share 3 accords: Musky, Powdery, Animalic.

Which is better, Roses, Roses or Passion?+

By community rating, Roses, Roses scores 4.31/5 vs Passion at 3.87/5. Passion's standout strength: Sexy, mysterious, and intimate scent profile. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Roses, Roses and Passion smell similar?+

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Passion: Passion by Elizabeth Taylor receives divided but passionate opinions from the fragrance community.

Which lasts longer, Roses, Roses or Passion?+

Passion: Affordable price point with good performance Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Roses, Roses vs Passion?+

Roses, Roses scores highest for summer wear; Passion scores highest for winter wear. Roses, Roses leans daytime, Passion leans evening.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Passion

Змішаний

54 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.8

/10

Passion by Elizabeth Taylor receives divided but passionate opinions from the fragrance community. While admirers celebrate it as a gorgeous, underrated vintage scent perfect for romantic occasions with a unique powdery-leather-woody profile, detractors find it overpowering, animalic, and reminiscent of dated bathroom products. The fragrance appeals most to those who appreciate bold, vintage fragrances rather than contemporary tastes.

Позитивний

Sexy, mysterious, and intimate scent profile
Beautiful powdery leather with plum and woody notes
Affordable price point with good performance
Underrated vintage fragrance with loyal admirers

Негативний

Polarizing - some find it overpowering and animalic
Divisive scent profile compared to modern standards
Not suitable for those preferring contemporary fragrances
Can smell like grandmotherly or vintage bathroom products to some