Richmond X Man vs A*Men

Порівняння Richmond X Man від John Richmond та A*Men від Mugler пліч-о-пліч

John Richmond

2014masculine

3.59(51)

Акорди

Mugler

1996masculine

4.02(10,706)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (4)

ДеревнийСолодкийВанільнийБурштиновий

Властивість	Richmond X Man	A*Men
Бренд	John Richmond	Mugler
Рік	2014	1996
Оцінка	3.59	4.02
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	masculine	masculine
Усього нот	11	21

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Richmond X Man and A*Men?+

Richmond X Man is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from John Richmond (2014) dominated by Lavender accords. A*Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Mugler (1996) leaning on Warm Spicy accords. They share 4 accords: Woody, Sweet, Vanilla, Amber.

Which is better, Richmond X Man or A*Men?+

By community rating, Richmond X Man scores 3.59/5 vs A*Men at 4.02/5. A*Men's standout strength: Original A*Men formulation has strong silage and longevity. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Richmond X Man and A*Men smell similar?+

They share 5 notes and 4 accords, including Woody, Sweet, Vanilla, Amber, Bergamot. A*Men: The A*Men line generates divided opinions, with the original formulation and Pure Havane flanker highly regarded, while recent releases like Stellar and Ultimate disappoint long-time fans.

Which lasts longer, Richmond X Man or A*Men?+

A*Men: Original A*Men formulation has strong silage and longevity Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Richmond X Man vs A*Men?+

Richmond X Man scores highest for fall wear; A*Men scores highest for winter wear. Richmond X Man leans daytime, A*Men leans evening.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — A*Men

Змішаний

47 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.5

/10

The A*Men line generates divided opinions, with the original formulation and Pure Havane flanker highly regarded, while recent releases like Stellar and Ultimate disappoint long-time fans. Community consensus indicates the line excels for evening wear in cooler seasons but struggles with versatility and summer compatibility, with notable quality decline in newer releases compared to vintage versions.

Позитивний

Original A*Men formulation has strong silage and longevity
Pure Havane is versatile and receives consistent praise for complexity
Kryptomint offers unique mint-chocolate character reminiscent of Andes Mints
Brand responsive to customer inquiries and sample requests

Негативний

Recent flankers (Stellar, Ultimate) perceived as weak, generic, and underwhelming compared to original
Pure Malt is overhyped, too linear, and lacks versatility for daily wear
Overall A*Men line DNA not suitable for warm weather or daytime wear
Quality concerns with newer releases compared to vintage formulations

Richmond X Man vs A*Men

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні ноти (5)

Унікальні для Richmond X Man (6)

Унікальні для A*Men (15)

Спільні акорди (4)

Часті запитання

Позитивний

Негативний