Maderas vs Black Afgano

Порівняння Maderas від Coqui Coqui та Black Afgano від Nasomatto пліч-о-пліч

Coqui Coqui

2005feminine

3.40(20)

Акорди

Nasomatto

2009feminine

4.06(11,830)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (3)

ДеревнийБальзамічнийАроматичний

Властивість	Maderas	Black Afgano
Бренд	Coqui Coqui	Nasomatto
Рік	2005	2009
Оцінка	3.40	4.06
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	0	23

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Maderas and Black Afgano?+

Maderas is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Coqui Coqui (2005) dominated by Woody accords. Black Afgano is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Nasomatto (2009) leaning on Amber accords. They share 3 accords: Woody, Balsamic, Aromatic.

Which is better, Maderas or Black Afgano?+

By community rating, Maderas scores 3.40/5 vs Black Afgano at 4.06/5. Black Afgano's standout strength: Unique and distinctive scent with impressive artistry and complexity. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Maderas and Black Afgano smell similar?+

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Black Afgano: Black Afgano is a divisive fragrance with genuine admirers and vocal detractors.

Which lasts longer, Maderas or Black Afgano?+

Black Afgano: Excellent performance and longevity as a powerful fragrance Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Maderas vs Black Afgano?+

Maderas scores highest for spring wear; Black Afgano scores highest for winter wear. Maderas leans evening, Black Afgano leans evening.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Black Afgano

Змішаний

68 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.2

/10

Black Afgano is a divisive fragrance with genuine admirers and vocal detractors. While it's praised for its artistry, complexity, and impressive construction, many find it impractical for everyday wear due to its challenging character and the cannabis-like notes that could be inappropriate in certain contexts. Recent reformulations have disappointed long-time fans with diminished performance, and the premium pricing limits its accessibility.

Позитивний

Unique and distinctive scent with impressive artistry and complexity
Excellent performance and longevity as a powerful fragrance
Well-made niche product with premium presentation and atomizer quality

Негативний

Highly polarizing and not for everyone; many find it unwearable
Potential cannabis/hashish notes may be problematic for work environments
Recent formula reformulations have significantly reduced performance and quality
Extremely expensive for a niche fragrance with limited practical wearability