Ludatrix vs You

Порівняння Ludatrix від Vyrao та You від Glossier пліч-о-пліч

Vyrao

2025feminine

3.61(36)

Акорди

Glossier

2017feminine

4.14(8,983)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Унікальні для Ludatrix (12)

Сичуанський перець Lipstick Ambrette Musk Mallow Троянда Latex Olibanum Frankincense Concrete Orris Root Кедр Мускус Сандал Ambroxan

Спільні акорди (4)

ПудровийМускуснийКвітковийБурштиновий

Властивість	Ludatrix	You
Бренд	Vyrao	Glossier
Рік	2025	2017
Оцінка	3.61	4.14
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	12	0

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Ludatrix and You?+

Ludatrix is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Vyrao (2025) dominated by Rose accords. You is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Glossier (2017) leaning on Musky accords. They share 4 accords: Powdery, Musky, Floral, Amber.

Which is better, Ludatrix or You?+

By community rating, Ludatrix scores 3.61/5 vs You at 4.14/5. You's standout strength: Pleasant, appealing scent profile with subtle skin scent quality. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Ludatrix and You smell similar?+

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. You: Glossier You is divisive in the fragrance community, primarily due to its post-reformulation performance.

Which lasts longer, Ludatrix or You?+

You: Receives genuine compliments from others hours after application Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Ludatrix vs You?+

Ludatrix scores highest for fall wear; You scores highest for spring wear. Ludatrix leans evening, You leans daytime.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — You

Змішаний

96 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

5.2

/10

Glossier You is divisive in the fragrance community, primarily due to its post-reformulation performance. While the scent profile itself receives praise for being pleasant and wearable, the drastically reduced longevity (often just minutes to hours) makes it a poor value at its premium price point. Performance varies significantly between individuals, with some reporting all-day wear while others describe it as a fleeting whisper, creating widespread frustration about quality control.

Позитивний

Pleasant, appealing scent profile with subtle skin scent quality
Good for those who prefer non-projecting fragrances
Performs well on some individuals despite reformulation
Receives genuine compliments from others hours after application

Негативний

Severe longevity issues post-reformulation (2 minutes to 1 hour for many users)
Poor longevity for the high price point ($72-100)
Inconsistent performance across product formats and individuals
Reformulation widely considered inferior to original formula