Glorious vs Safari

Порівняння Glorious від Gloria Vanderbilt та Safari від Ralph Lauren пліч-о-пліч

Gloria Vanderbilt

1988feminine

4.00(80)

Акорди

Ralph Lauren

1990feminine

4.14(3,263)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (5)

ЗеленийКвітковийДеревнийАроматичнийСвіжий пряний

Властивість	Glorious	Safari
Бренд	Gloria Vanderbilt	Ralph Lauren
Рік	1988	1990
Оцінка	4.00	4.14
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	17	19

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Glorious and Safari?+

Glorious is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Gloria Vanderbilt (1988) dominated by Green accords. Safari is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Ralph Lauren (1990) leaning on Aromatic accords. They share 5 accords: Green, Floral, Woody, Aromatic.

Which is better, Glorious or Safari?+

By community rating, Glorious scores 4.00/5 vs Safari at 4.14/5. Safari's standout strength: Classic, clean masculine scent with timeless appeal. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Glorious and Safari smell similar?+

They share 9 notes and 5 accords, including Green, Floral, Woody, Aromatic, Fresh Spicy. Safari: Safari is a classic, clean masculine fragrance with strong nostalgic appeal and an iconic bottle, but community consensus suggests it feels dated by modern standards and may not live up to expectations for those blind buying based on childhood memories.

Which lasts longer, Glorious or Safari?+

Safari: Potential reformulation has weakened longevity and performance Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Glorious vs Safari?+

Glorious scores highest for spring wear; Safari scores highest for fall wear. Glorious leans daytime, Safari leans daytime.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Safari

Змішаний

58 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.2

/10

Safari is a classic, clean masculine fragrance with strong nostalgic appeal and an iconic bottle, but community consensus suggests it feels dated by modern standards and may not live up to expectations for those blind buying based on childhood memories. Performance appears diminished compared to vintage formulations, though some still enjoy it as an understated workhorse scent.

Позитивний

Classic, clean masculine scent with timeless appeal
Iconic bottle design that's visually distinctive
Nostalgic value for those who wore it in their youth
Suitable for professional/office settings

Негативний

Feels dated compared to modern fragrance standards
Potential reformulation has weakened longevity and performance
Blind buying disappointing for many who relied on nostalgia
Not universally flattering; polarizing bottle shape

Glorious vs Safari

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні ноти (9)

Унікальні для Glorious (8)

Унікальні для Safari (9)

Спільні акорди (5)

Часті запитання

Позитивний

Негативний