Cycle vs Azzaro pour Homme

Порівняння Cycle від Otto Kern та Azzaro pour Homme від Azzaro пліч-о-пліч

Otto Kern

1991masculine

4.04(46)

Акорди

Azzaro

1978masculine

3.89(6,896)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Унікальні для Azzaro pour Homme (19)

Лаванда Лимон Caraway Базилік Бергамот Clary Sage Ірис Бадьян Ветивер Кедр Сандал Пачулі Bagas De Zimbro Кардамон Дубовий мох Шкіра Бурштин Мускус Боби тонка

Спільні акорди (4)

АроматичнийДеревнийЦитрусовийСвіжий пряний

Властивість	Cycle	Azzaro pour Homme
Бренд	Otto Kern	Azzaro
Рік	1991	1978
Оцінка	4.04	3.89
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	masculine	masculine
Усього нот	0	19

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Cycle and Azzaro pour Homme?+

Cycle is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Otto Kern (1991) dominated by Green accords. Azzaro pour Homme is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Azzaro (1978) leaning on Aromatic accords. They share 4 accords: Aromatic, Woody, Citrus, Fresh Spicy.

Which is better, Cycle or Azzaro pour Homme?+

By community rating, Cycle scores 4.04/5 vs Azzaro pour Homme at 3.89/5. Azzaro pour Homme's standout strength: Excellent value for money, very affordable. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Cycle and Azzaro pour Homme smell similar?+

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Azzaro pour Homme: Azzaro Pour Homme is a polarizing classic that inspires passionate but divided opinions.

Which lasts longer, Cycle or Azzaro pour Homme?+

Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Cycle vs Azzaro pour Homme?+

Cycle scores highest for spring wear; Azzaro pour Homme scores highest for all seasons wear. Cycle leans daytime, Azzaro pour Homme leans daytime.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Azzaro pour Homme

Змішаний

26 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.2

/10

Azzaro Pour Homme is a polarizing classic that inspires passionate but divided opinions. While admirers praise its affordable price, compelling drydown, and vintage charm, detractors find the top notes aggressively dated and barber shop-like, with modern versions suffering from poor projection. Success with this fragrance largely depends on personal tolerance for its distinctive anise and soapy character.

Позитивний

Excellent value for money, very affordable
Strong drydown with anise and cumin notes that improves over time
Classic, well-built fragrance with historical significance
Delicious and straightforward scent profile

Негативний

Challenging and divisive top notes that many find off-putting
Modern reformulations are heavily diluted and require excessive sprays
Reads as dated or 'old man' to many contemporary wearers
Distinct barber shop/soapy characteristics not universally appealing