Como vs Comme des Garcons 2

Порівняння Como від Duomo Perfume House та Comme des Garcons 2 від Comme des Garcons пліч-о-пліч

Duomo Perfume House

2024feminine

4.83(6)

Акорди

Comme des Garcons

1999feminine

4.18(4,597)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (3)

АроматичнийСвіжий прянийЦитрусовий

Властивість	Como	Comme des Garcons 2
Бренд	Duomo Perfume House	Comme des Garcons
Рік	2024	1999
Оцінка	4.83	4.18
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	20	18

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Como and Comme des Garcons 2?+

Como is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Duomo Perfume House (2024) dominated by Marine accords. Comme des Garcons 2 is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Comme des Garcons (1999) leaning on Aromatic accords. They share 3 accords: Aromatic, Fresh Spicy, Citrus.

Which is better, Como or Comme des Garcons 2?+

By community rating, Como scores 4.83/5 vs Comme des Garcons 2 at 4.18/5. Comme des Garcons 2's standout strength: Distinctive aldehydic opening with prominent ink note. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Como and Comme des Garcons 2 smell similar?+

They share 1 notes and 3 accords, including Aromatic, Fresh Spicy, Citrus, Aldehydes. Comme des Garcons 2: The r/fragrance community views CDG 2 as a distinctive niche fragrance with an interesting aldehydic-ink profile, but consensus suggests it has been reformulated for the worse over time.

Which lasts longer, Como or Comme des Garcons 2?+

Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Como vs Comme des Garcons 2?+

Como scores highest for summer wear; Comme des Garcons 2 scores highest for fall wear. Como leans daytime, Comme des Garcons 2 leans daytime.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Comme des Garcons 2

Змішаний

43 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

6.5

/10

The r/fragrance community views CDG 2 as a distinctive niche fragrance with an interesting aldehydic-ink profile, but consensus suggests it has been reformulated for the worse over time. Older bottles are preferred by enthusiasts, while current versions are considered less impactful and more powdery than the original edgy composition from 1999.

Позитивний

Distinctive aldehydic opening with prominent ink note
Unique futuristic floral character
Interesting and complex composition with good note diversity

Негативний

Reformulation over the years has made it less impactful and edgy
Can smell powdery and soapy on skin for some wearers
Vintage batches perform significantly better than current versions

Como vs Comme des Garcons 2

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні ноти (1)

Унікальні для Como (19)

Унікальні для Comme des Garcons 2 (17)

Спільні акорди (3)

Часті запитання

Позитивний

Негативний