Chanel No 46 vs Madame Rochas

Порівняння Chanel No 46 від Chanel та Madame Rochas від Rochas пліч-о-пліч

Chanel

1946feminine

4.11(38)

Акорди

Rochas

1960feminine

4.08(2,194)

Акорди

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні акорди (4)

ДеревнийБілоквітковийПудровийКвітковий

Властивість	Chanel No 46	Madame Rochas
Бренд	Chanel	Rochas
Рік	1946	1960
Оцінка	4.11	4.08
Концентрація	—	—
Стать	feminine	feminine
Усього нот	13	24

Часті запитання

What's the difference between Chanel No 46 and Madame Rochas?+

Chanel No 46 is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Chanel (1946) dominated by Woody accords. Madame Rochas is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Rochas (1960) leaning on Woody accords. They share 4 accords: Woody, White Floral, Powdery, Floral.

Which is better, Chanel No 46 or Madame Rochas?+

By community rating, Chanel No 46 scores 4.11/5 vs Madame Rochas at 4.08/5. Madame Rochas's standout strength: Beautiful aldehydic floral structure with distinctive character. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Chanel No 46 and Madame Rochas smell similar?+

They share 10 notes and 4 accords, including Woody, White Floral, Powdery, Floral, Bergamot. Madame Rochas: Madame Rochas is recognized by the fragrance community as a well-crafted aldehydic floral with Guy Robert's signature elegant composition and tart floral notes.

Which lasts longer, Chanel No 46 or Madame Rochas?+

Madame Rochas: Good longevity and presence Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Chanel No 46 vs Madame Rochas?+

Chanel No 46 scores highest for winter wear; Madame Rochas scores highest for fall wear. Chanel No 46 leans evening, Madame Rochas leans daytime.

Пульс настроїв спільноти — Madame Rochas

Позитивний

44 думок · Джерело: спільнота r/fragrance

7.8

/10

Madame Rochas is recognized by the fragrance community as a well-crafted aldehydic floral with Guy Robert's signature elegant composition and tart floral notes. While highly respected for its structure and wearability, the community notes it has become much more affordable than its original luxury pricing, likely due to reformulation and ingredient substitution over time. It remains a worthwhile classic for those who appreciate vintage-style aldehydic florals.

Позитивний

Beautiful aldehydic floral structure with distinctive character
Guy Robert's masterful composition with tart floral notes
Elegant and wearable despite classic aldehydic profile
Good longevity and presence

Негативний

Now significantly cheaper than original vintage versions due to reformulation
May contain inferior/synthetic ingredients compared to classic formulation
Aldehydic character can feel dated or powdery to some modern wearers

Chanel No 46 vs Madame Rochas

Підсумок порівняння

Спільні ноти (10)

Унікальні для Chanel No 46 (3)

Унікальні для Madame Rochas (14)

Спільні акорди (4)

Часті запитання

Позитивний

Негативний