Clever vs Fantasy

Сравнение Clever от Mary Kay и Fantasy от Britney Spears бок о бок

Mary Kay

2015feminine

3.69(110)

Аккорды

Britney Spears

2005feminine

3.94(16,056)

Аккорды

Сводка сравнения

Общие аккорды (6)

ЦветочныйСладкийФруктовыйПудровыйСвежийМускусный

Свойство	Clever	Fantasy
Бренд	Mary Kay	Britney Spears
Год	2015	2005
Оценка	3.69	3.94
Концентрация	—	—
Пол	feminine	feminine
Всего нот	9	10

Частые вопросы

What's the difference between Clever and Fantasy?+

Clever is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Mary Kay (2015) dominated by Floral accords. Fantasy is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Britney Spears (2005) leaning on Sweet accords. They share 6 accords: Floral, Sweet, Fruity, Powdery.

Which is better, Clever or Fantasy?+

By community rating, Clever scores 3.69/5 vs Fantasy at 3.94/5. Fantasy's standout strength: Very affordable price point (under $20). The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Clever and Fantasy smell similar?+

They share 2 notes and 6 accords, including Floral, Sweet, Fruity, Powdery, Fresh. Fantasy: The community has divided opinions on Fantasy, with many praising its affordability and pleasant gourmand qualities, while others find it overhyped or diminished by reformulation.

Which lasts longer, Clever or Fantasy?+

Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Clever vs Fantasy?+

Clever scores highest for spring wear; Fantasy scores highest for winter wear. Clever leans daytime, Fantasy leans daytime.

Пульс настроений сообщества — Fantasy

Смешанное

33 мнений · Источник: сообщество r/fragrance

6.2

/10

The community has divided opinions on Fantasy, with many praising its affordability and pleasant gourmand qualities, while others find it overhyped or diminished by reformulation. A significant concern is potential counterfeits from online sellers, prompting recommendations to purchase in-store. The consensus suggests it's decent for the price but not exceptional compared to modern gourmands or its original 90s/2000s formulation.

Позитивное

Very affordable price point (under $20)
Pleasant, fruity-sweet gourmand scent profile
Widely available in physical stores for testing
Multiple flankers offer different variations

Негативное

Reformulated formula reportedly less sweet than original version
Can smell cheap or synthetic to some users
Counterfeits circulate, especially through online retailers
Some find it harsh or screechy rather than cupcake-like

Clever vs Fantasy

Сводка сравнения

Общие ноты (2)

Уникальные для Clever (7)

Уникальные для Fantasy (8)

Общие аккорды (6)

Частые вопросы

Позитивное

Негативное