C'est La Vie vs Amarige

Сравнение C'est La Vie от Christian Lacroix и Amarige от Givenchy бок о бок

Christian Lacroix

1990feminine

4.09(473)

Аккорды

Givenchy

1991feminine

3.91(8,957)

Аккорды

Сводка сравнения

Общие аккорды (6)

ЦветочныйБелоцветочныйФруктовыйДревесныйПудровыйСладкий

Свойство	C'est La Vie	Amarige
Бренд	Christian Lacroix	Givenchy
Год	1990	1991
Оценка	4.09	3.91
Концентрация	—	—
Пол	feminine	feminine
Всего нот	0	26

Частые вопросы

What's the difference between C'est La Vie and Amarige?+

C'est La Vie is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Christian Lacroix (1990) dominated by Floral accords. Amarige is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Givenchy (1991) leaning on White Floral accords. They share 6 accords: Floral, White Floral, Fruity, Woody.

Which is better, C'est La Vie or Amarige?+

By community rating, C'est La Vie scores 4.09/5 vs Amarige at 3.91/5. Amarige's standout strength: Beautiful floral composition on paper and in the bottle. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do C'est La Vie and Amarige smell similar?+

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Amarige: Amarige is a divisive fragrance with significant skin chemistry variation—some find it a gorgeous creamy floral while others experience a complete transformation into an unpleasant animalic scent.

Which lasts longer, C'est La Vie or Amarige?+

Amarige: Powerful projection and longevity Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits C'est La Vie vs Amarige?+

C'est La Vie scores highest for fall wear; Amarige scores highest for fall wear. C'est La Vie leans evening, Amarige leans daytime.

Пульс настроений сообщества — Amarige

Смешанное

83 мнений · Источник: сообщество r/fragrance

5.5

/10

Amarige is a divisive fragrance with significant skin chemistry variation—some find it a gorgeous creamy floral while others experience a complete transformation into an unpleasant animalic scent. The community consensus is that while the original formula was superior, the modern reformulation is overly loud and dated, making it difficult for most to wear outside the home despite its undeniable projection and longevity.

Позитивное

Beautiful floral composition on paper and in the bottle
Smooth, creamy, and sunny character when it works well on skin
Powerful projection and longevity
Nostalgic 90s fragrance with strong presence

Негативное

Turns animalic, dirty, or soapy on some skin types
Extremely loud and brash - difficult to wear in public
Reformulated around 2007-2008 and no longer as well-rounded as original
Can smell bitter, musty, or unpleasant on certain individuals
Comes across as dated and potentially offensive to modern sensibilities