Question 1

What's the difference between Matsu and Noa?

Accepted Answer

Matsu is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Masaki Matsushima (2014) dominated by Floral accords. Noa is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Cacharel (1998) leaning on Floral accords. They share 6 accords: Floral, Fresh, White Floral, Musky.

Question 2

Which is better, Matsu or Noa?

Accepted Answer

By community rating, Matsu scores 3.67/5 vs Noa at 3.88/5. Noa's standout strength: Fresh and clean scent reminiscent of soap and Nivea cream. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Question 3

Do Matsu and Noa smell similar?

Accepted Answer

They share 4 notes and 6 accords, including Floral, Fresh, White Floral, Musky, Green. Noa: Noa by Cacharel is remembered fondly by the community as a nostalgic, fresh fragrance with a clean, soapy profile that evokes Dove soap and Nivea cream.

Question 4

Which lasts longer, Matsu or Noa?

Accepted Answer

Noa: Moderate to weak longevity and projection Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Question 5

Which season suits Matsu vs Noa?

Accepted Answer

Matsu scores highest for spring wear; Noa scores highest for all seasons wear. Matsu leans daytime, Noa leans daytime.

Matsu vs Noa

Rezumatul comparației

Note comune (4)

Unice pentru Matsu (6)

Unice pentru Noa (15)

Acorduri comune (6)

Întrebări frecvente

Pulsul sentimentului comunității — Noa

Pozitiv

Negativ

Atribut	Matsu	Noa
Brand	Masaki Matsushima	Cacharel
An	2014	1998
Evaluare	3.67	3.88
Concentrație	—	—
Gen	feminine	feminine
Total note	10	19