Question 1

What's the difference between Bob Mackie and Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

Bob Mackie is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Bob Mackie (1985) dominated by its signature accords. Blue Grass is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Elizabeth Arden (1936) leaning on Warm Spicy accords. They share no primary accords — distinctly different profiles.

Question 2

Which is better, Bob Mackie or Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

By community rating, Bob Mackie scores 3.80/5 vs Blue Grass at 3.52/5. Blue Grass's standout strength: Clean, fresh scent reminiscent of quality shampoo. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Question 3

Do Bob Mackie and Blue Grass smell similar?

Accepted Answer

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Blue Grass: Blue Grass by Elizabeth Arden is well-regarded in the community for its clean, shampoo-like quality and distinctive carnation note with good longevity.

Question 4

Which lasts longer, Bob Mackie or Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

Blue Grass: Excellent longevity lasting all day Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Question 5

Which season suits Bob Mackie vs Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

Bob Mackie scores highest for winter wear; Blue Grass scores highest for spring wear. Bob Mackie leans evening, Blue Grass leans daytime.

Bob Mackie vs Blue Grass

Rezumatul comparației

Unice pentru Blue Grass (21)

Pulsul sentimentului comunității — Blue Grass

Pozitiv

Negativ

Întrebări frecvente

Atribut	Bob Mackie	Blue Grass
Brand	Bob Mackie	Elizabeth Arden
An	1985	1936
Evaluare	3.80	3.52
Concentrație	—	—
Gen	feminine	feminine
Total note	0	22