What's the difference between Michael for Men and London for Men?+
Michael for Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Michael Kors (2001) dominated by Fruity accords. London for Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Burberry (2006) leaning on Tobacco accords. They share 5 accords: Sweet, Woody, Warm Spicy, Tobacco.
Which is better, Michael for Men or London for Men?+
By community rating, Michael for Men scores 4.25/5 vs London for Men at 4.25/5. London for Men's standout strength: Pleasant warm spicy scent with tobacco and pine notes reminiscent of Christmas. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do Michael for Men and London for Men smell similar?+
They share 3 notes and 5 accords, including Sweet, Woody, Warm Spicy, Tobacco, Amber. London for Men: The r/fragrance community appreciates Burberry London for Men's pleasant seasonal scent and affordable price, but consistently reports disappointing longevity of only 2-4 hours on skin.
Which lasts longer, Michael for Men or London for Men?+
London for Men: Poor longevity and projection, lasting only 2-4 hours on skin Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits Michael for Men vs London for Men?+
Michael for Men scores highest for all seasons wear; London for Men scores highest for winter wear. Michael for Men leans daytime, London for Men leans evening.
