RM Woman vs Passion

Remy Marquis RM Woman ба Elizabeth Taylor Passion-г зэрэгцүүлэн харьцуулах

Remy Marquis

2009feminine

3.75(8)

Аккорд

Elizabeth Taylor

1988feminine

3.87(2,040)

Аккорд

Харьцуулалтын хураангуй

Нийтлэг аккорд (4)

ХүжирлэгМодонПудрынАмьтны

Шинж	RM Woman	Passion
Брэнд	Remy Marquis	Elizabeth Taylor
Он	2009	1988
Үнэлгээ	3.75	3.87
Концентраци	—	—
Хүйс	feminine	feminine
Нийт нот	0	26

Түгээмэл асуулт

What's the difference between RM Woman and Passion?+

RM Woman is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Remy Marquis (2009) dominated by Floral accords. Passion is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Elizabeth Taylor (1988) leaning on Woody accords. They share 4 accords: Musky, Woody, Powdery, Animalic.

Which is better, RM Woman or Passion?+

By community rating, RM Woman scores 3.75/5 vs Passion at 3.87/5. Passion's standout strength: Sexy, mysterious, and intimate scent profile. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do RM Woman and Passion smell similar?+

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Passion: Passion by Elizabeth Taylor receives divided but passionate opinions from the fragrance community.

Which lasts longer, RM Woman or Passion?+

Passion: Affordable price point with good performance Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits RM Woman vs Passion?+

RM Woman scores highest for all seasons wear; Passion scores highest for winter wear. RM Woman leans daytime, Passion leans evening.

Нийгэмлэгийн сэтгэлийн пульс — Passion

Холимог

54 санал · Эх сурвалж: r/fragrance нийгэмлэг

6.8

/10

Passion by Elizabeth Taylor receives divided but passionate opinions from the fragrance community. While admirers celebrate it as a gorgeous, underrated vintage scent perfect for romantic occasions with a unique powdery-leather-woody profile, detractors find it overpowering, animalic, and reminiscent of dated bathroom products. The fragrance appeals most to those who appreciate bold, vintage fragrances rather than contemporary tastes.

Эерэг

Sexy, mysterious, and intimate scent profile
Beautiful powdery leather with plum and woody notes
Affordable price point with good performance
Underrated vintage fragrance with loyal admirers

Сөрөг

Polarizing - some find it overpowering and animalic
Divisive scent profile compared to modern standards
Not suitable for those preferring contemporary fragrances
Can smell like grandmotherly or vintage bathroom products to some