8
ノート
8
アコード
1
調香師
Chance Eau Tendre
レディース
クリエイター Jacques Polge
Chance Eau Tendre by Chanel is a Floral Fruity fragrance for women. Chance Eau Tendre was launched in 2010. The nose behind this fragrance is Jacques Polge. Top notes are Quince and Grapefruit; middle notes are Hyacinth and Jasmine; base notes are Musk, Iris, Virginia Cedar and Amber. Chanel is presenting a new flanker of their popular fragrance Chance which arrives on the market on April 2nd 2010. The romantic and pink new version, Chance Eau Tendre, is announced as a floral-fruity interpretation of Chance EDP. Face of advertising campaign is Sigrid Agren, and photographer is Jean-Paul Goude. The flacon is the same as its antecedent, but it is characterized by pink fluid this time. The fragrance will be available as 50 and 100ml.
Affordable Alternatives
View all 4→
ベストシーズン
17%
冬
96%
春
79%
夏
25%
秋
昼と夜
100%
昼
18%
夜
香りのピラミッド
オープニングからドライダウンまで、コミュニティ投票に基づく強度。
オープニング
ミドル
ドライダウン
トップノート0 – 15分
ハートノート15分 – 3時間
ユーザー評価
19,313 票
4.13
大好き
8.0k41%
好き
8.0k41%
普通
1.1k6%
好きではない
2.1k11%
苦手
1131%
Community Insights
MixedBased on 55 community opinions from Reddit
6.5
/ 10 community score
r/fragranceコミュニティは、Chance Eau Tendreを賛否両論の香水と見なしており、フレッシュで軽やかなフローラルを高く評価する熱心なファンがいる一方で、パウダリーで香りが短命で、成熟しすぎた香りだと感じる批評家も多くいます。EDPとEDTバージョンは賛否両論の評価を受けており、ヘアミストはより爽やかな代替品として好む人もいます。
Strengths
- Fresh, light, and inoffensive scent suitable for office wear
- Feminine and fruity with a pleasant shampoo-like quality
- Good for those who prefer non-floral or lighter fragrances
- Hair mist version offers a fresher, younger alternative to EDP
Weaknesses
- Powdery and musky qualities can read as old-fashioned to some wearers
- Poor longevity, especially the EDT version which doesn't last long
- Rose note can be polarizing and turn unpleasant on some skin types
- Floral profile not appealing to those who dislike florals
Best for
Office wear and professional settingsDaytime and all-season casual wearThose seeking subtle, inoffensive feminine scentsLight, fresh fragrance layering
AI-generated summary based on public community discussions. Not affiliated with the opinions' authors.
