What's the difference between Rich and 1872 For Men?+
Rich is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Bortnikoff (2023) dominated by Fresh Spicy accords. 1872 For Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Clive Christian (2001) leaning on Aromatic accords. They share 3 accords: Fresh Spicy, Citrus, Woody.
Which is better, Rich or 1872 For Men?+
By community rating, Rich scores 4.38/5 vs 1872 For Men at 4.32/5. 1872 For Men's standout strength: Good choice for work wear. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do Rich and 1872 For Men smell similar?+
They share 4 notes and 3 accords, including Fresh Spicy, Citrus, Woody, Bergamot, Patchouli. 1872 For Men: Clive Christian 1872 for Menはこのスレッドでコミュニティからの関心が最小限に留まり、涼しい天候での仕事用のSOTD選択肢として1回言及されたのみです。複数のユーザーからの詳細な意見やフィードバックが不足しているため、コミュニティの総意は不明確です。.
Which lasts longer, Rich or 1872 For Men?+
1872 For Men: No consensus on performance or longevity Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits Rich vs 1872 For Men?+
Rich scores highest for fall wear; 1872 For Men scores highest for all seasons wear. Rich leans daytime, 1872 For Men leans daytime.
