What's the difference between Michael for Men and London for Men?+
Michael for Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Michael Kors (2001) dominated by Fruity accords. London for Men is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Burberry (2006) leaning on Tobacco accords. They share 5 accords: Sweet, Woody, Warm Spicy, Tobacco.
Which is better, Michael for Men or London for Men?+
By community rating, Michael for Men scores 4.25/5 vs London for Men at 4.25/5. London for Men's standout strength: Pleasant warm spicy scent with tobacco and pine notes reminiscent of Christmas. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do Michael for Men and London for Men smell similar?+
They share 3 notes and 5 accords, including Sweet, Woody, Warm Spicy, Tobacco, Amber. London for Men: r/fragranceコミュニティは、バーバリー ロンドン フォー メンの心地よい季節の香りと手頃な価格を高く評価していますが、肌での持続時間がわずか2～4時間という残念な結果が一貫して報告されています。この香水は温かみのあるスパイスとホリデーシーズンの魅力で高い評価を受けていますが、弱い持続性は大きな欠点であり、多くのユーザーは低価格と再度の付け直しの容易さのためだけにこれを受け入れています。.
Which lasts longer, Michael for Men or London for Men?+
London for Men: Poor longevity and projection, lasting only 2-4 hours on skin Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits Michael for Men vs London for Men?+
Michael for Men scores highest for all seasons wear; London for Men scores highest for winter wear. Michael for Men leans daytime, London for Men leans evening.
