What's the difference between Laurel Canyon, 1966 and Philosykos Eau de Parfum?+
Laurel Canyon, 1966 is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Thin Wild Mercury (2019) dominated by Citrus accords. Philosykos Eau de Parfum is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Diptyque (1996) leaning on Green accords. They share 2 accords: Green, Woody.
Which is better, Laurel Canyon, 1966 or Philosykos Eau de Parfum?+
By community rating, Laurel Canyon, 1966 scores 4.23/5 vs Philosykos Eau de Parfum at 4.15/5. Philosykos Eau de Parfum's standout strength: Pleasant fig scent that smells appealing. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do Laurel Canyon, 1966 and Philosykos Eau de Parfum smell similar?+
They share 1 notes and 2 accords, including Green, Woody, Green Notes. Philosykos Eau de Parfum: フィロシコスはコミュニティから心地よいイチジクの香りで高く評価され、人気のA-Zフレグランス投票でPの文字を獲得しましたが、肌の上で1時間以下という極めて悪い持続性について広く批判されています。フレグランス自体は好まれていますが、その弱いパフォーマンスはオーデパルファムとしてマーケティングされているにもかかわらず、終日の使用には実用的ではありません。.
Which lasts longer, Laurel Canyon, 1966 or Philosykos Eau de Parfum?+
Philosykos Eau de Parfum: Poor longevity - lasts only 30 minutes to 1 hour on skin Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits Laurel Canyon, 1966 vs Philosykos Eau de Parfum?+
Laurel Canyon, 1966 scores highest for spring wear; Philosykos Eau de Parfum scores highest for summer wear. Laurel Canyon, 1966 leans daytime, Philosykos Eau de Parfum leans daytime.
