What's the difference between Laurel Canyon, 1966 and Dear Polly?+
Laurel Canyon, 1966 is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Thin Wild Mercury (2019) dominated by Citrus accords. Dear Polly is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Vilhelm Parfumerie (2015) leaning on Green accords. They share 2 accords: Citrus, Green.
Which is better, Laurel Canyon, 1966 or Dear Polly?+
By community rating, Laurel Canyon, 1966 scores 4.23/5 vs Dear Polly at 4.02/5. Dear Polly's standout strength: Beautiful, unique tea-forward scent with smoky and incense notes. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do Laurel Canyon, 1966 and Dear Polly smell similar?+
They share 1 notes and 2 accords, including Citrus, Green, Ambergris. Dear Polly: Dear Pollyは紅茶の香りを愛好し、官能的でよく調合された香りを高く評価するコミュニティに愛されており、肌質によっては優れた持続性を発揮します。しかし、コミュニティの共通認識としては、持続性の低さと肌密着型の投影力の弱さが、プレミアム価格帯と相まって、フルサイズの購入を正当化するのが難しいということです。このフレグランスは、夏の香りとして親密な場面での着用や、明るい相性の良い香りとのレイヤリングの際に最も輝きます。.
Which lasts longer, Laurel Canyon, 1966 or Dear Polly?+
Dear Polly: Poor longevity: typically 6-8 hours with minimal projection, sits close to skin Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits Laurel Canyon, 1966 vs Dear Polly?+
Laurel Canyon, 1966 scores highest for spring wear; Dear Polly scores highest for spring wear. Laurel Canyon, 1966 leans daytime, Dear Polly leans daytime.
