What's the difference between DNA for Men 2004 and Polo?+
DNA for Men 2004 is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Bijan (2004) dominated by Lavender accords. Polo is a masculine fragrance (marketed to men, though wearable by all) from Ralph Lauren (1978) leaning on Woody accords. They share 3 accords: Aromatic, Woody, Fresh Spicy.
Which is better, DNA for Men 2004 or Polo?+
By community rating, DNA for Men 2004 scores 4.33/5 vs Polo at 3.82/5. Polo's standout strength: Good starter fragrance option. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.
Do DNA for Men 2004 and Polo smell similar?+
They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Polo: Ralph Laurenのポロラインは、r/fragranceコミュニティから賛否両論の評価を受けています。アクセスしやすいエントリーレベルの香水として認識されており、品質も悪くありませんが、多くの経験豊富な愛好家は、オリジナルの香りがニッチな代替品と比べて平凡またはジェネリックだと感じています。ポロ ブルー ゴールド ブレンドやウルトラ ブルーなどの特定のフランカーはより多くの熱狂を集めていますが、カジュアルなパーティーシーンでの過度な露出が原因で、積極的にこのブランドを避けるユーザーもいます。.
Which lasts longer, DNA for Men 2004 or Polo?+
Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.
Which season suits DNA for Men 2004 vs Polo?+
DNA for Men 2004 scores highest for spring wear; Polo scores highest for winter wear. DNA for Men 2004 leans evening, Polo leans daytime.
