Question 1

What's the difference between Type D and Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

Type D is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Henrik Vibskov (2011) dominated by White Floral accords. Musc Ravageur is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Frederic Malle (2000) leaning on Warm Spicy accords. They share 6 accords: Vanilla, Amber, Warm Spicy, Woody.

Question 2

Which is better, Type D or Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

By community rating, Type D scores 4.63/5 vs Musc Ravageur at 4.21/5. Musc Ravageur's standout strength: Excellent performance and longevity. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Question 3

Do Type D and Musc Ravageur smell similar?

Accepted Answer

They share 5 notes and 6 accords, including Vanilla, Amber, Warm Spicy, Woody, Cinnamon. Musc Ravageur: Musc Ravageur è molto apprezzato nella comunità dei profumi come una fragranza unisex distintiva e ben realizzata con prestazioni eccellenti.

Question 4

Which lasts longer, Type D or Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

Musc Ravageur: Excellent performance and longevity Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Question 5

Which season suits Type D vs Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

Type D scores highest for fall wear; Musc Ravageur scores highest for winter wear. Type D leans evening, Musc Ravageur leans evening.

Type D vs Musc Ravageur

Riepilogo del confronto

Note in comune (5)

Esclusive di Type D (5)

Esclusive di Musc Ravageur (14)

Accordi in comune (6)

Domande frequenti

Polso del sentimento della comunità — Musc Ravageur

Positivo

Negativo

Attributo	Type D	Musc Ravageur
Marchio	Henrik Vibskov	Frederic Malle
Anno	2011	2000
Valutazione	4.63	4.21
Concentrazione	—	—
Genere	feminine	feminine
Note totali	10	19