Question 1

What's the difference between Bob Mackie and Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

Bob Mackie is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Bob Mackie (1985) dominated by its signature accords. Blue Grass is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Elizabeth Arden (1936) leaning on Warm Spicy accords. They share no primary accords — distinctly different profiles.

Question 2

Which is better, Bob Mackie or Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

By community rating, Bob Mackie scores 3.80/5 vs Blue Grass at 3.52/5. Blue Grass's standout strength: Clean, fresh scent reminiscent of quality shampoo. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Question 3

Do Bob Mackie and Blue Grass smell similar?

Accepted Answer

They share a small fraction of their ingredients — expect noticeably different experiences. Blue Grass: Blue Grass de Elizabeth Arden es bien valorado en la comunidad por su calidad limpia similar a champú y su distintiva nota de clavel con buena longevidad.

Question 4

Which lasts longer, Bob Mackie or Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

Blue Grass: Excellent longevity lasting all day Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Question 5

Which season suits Bob Mackie vs Blue Grass?

Accepted Answer

Bob Mackie scores highest for winter wear; Blue Grass scores highest for spring wear. Bob Mackie leans evening, Blue Grass leans daytime.

Bob Mackie vs Blue Grass

Resumen de la comparación

Exclusivas de Blue Grass (21)

Pulso del sentimiento de la comunidad — Blue Grass

Positivo

Negativo

Preguntas frecuentes

Atributo	Bob Mackie	Blue Grass
Marca	Bob Mackie	Elizabeth Arden
Año	1985	1936
Valoración	3.80	3.52
Concentración	—	—
Género	feminine	feminine
Total de notas	0	22