Vivage vs Safari

Σύγκριση πλάι-πλάι του Vivage από Louis Feraud και Safari από Ralph Lauren

Louis Feraud

1984feminine

4.23(22)

Ακόρντα

Ralph Lauren

1990feminine

4.14(3,263)

Ακόρντα

Σύνοψη σύγκρισης

Κοινές νότες (3)

Κεχριμπάρι Κέδρος Σανταλόξυλο

Κοινά ακόρντα (3)

ΞυλώδεςΑρωματικόΑνθικό

Χαρακτηριστικό	Vivage	Safari
Οίκος	Louis Feraud	Ralph Lauren
Έτος	1984	1990
Βαθμολογία	4.23	4.14
Συγκέντρωση	—	—
Φύλο	feminine	feminine
Σύνολο νοτών	16	19

Συχνές ερωτήσεις

What's the difference between Vivage and Safari?+

Vivage is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Louis Feraud (1984) dominated by Woody accords. Safari is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Ralph Lauren (1990) leaning on Aromatic accords. They share 3 accords: Woody, Aromatic, Floral.

Which is better, Vivage or Safari?+

By community rating, Vivage scores 4.23/5 vs Safari at 4.14/5. Safari's standout strength: Classic, clean masculine scent with timeless appeal. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Do Vivage and Safari smell similar?+

They share 3 notes and 3 accords, including Woody, Aromatic, Floral, Amber, Cedar. Safari: Safari is a classic, clean masculine fragrance with strong nostalgic appeal and an iconic bottle, but community consensus suggests it feels dated by modern standards and may not live up to expectations for those blind buying based on childhood memories.

Which lasts longer, Vivage or Safari?+

Safari: Potential reformulation has weakened longevity and performance Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Which season suits Vivage vs Safari?+

Vivage scores highest for all seasons wear; Safari scores highest for fall wear. Vivage leans daytime, Safari leans daytime.

Παλμός συναισθήματος κοινότητας — Safari

Μεικτό

58 γνώμες · Πηγή: κοινότητα r/fragrance

6.2

/10

Safari is a classic, clean masculine fragrance with strong nostalgic appeal and an iconic bottle, but community consensus suggests it feels dated by modern standards and may not live up to expectations for those blind buying based on childhood memories. Performance appears diminished compared to vintage formulations, though some still enjoy it as an understated workhorse scent.

Θετικό

Classic, clean masculine scent with timeless appeal
Iconic bottle design that's visually distinctive
Nostalgic value for those who wore it in their youth
Suitable for professional/office settings

Αρνητικό

Feels dated compared to modern fragrance standards
Potential reformulation has weakened longevity and performance
Blind buying disappointing for many who relied on nostalgia
Not universally flattering; polarizing bottle shape