Question 1

What's the difference between Type D and Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

Type D is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Henrik Vibskov (2011) dominated by White Floral accords. Musc Ravageur is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Frederic Malle (2000) leaning on Warm Spicy accords. They share 6 accords: Vanilla, Amber, Warm Spicy, Woody.

Question 2

Which is better, Type D or Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

By community rating, Type D scores 4.63/5 vs Musc Ravageur at 4.21/5. Musc Ravageur's standout strength: Excellent performance and longevity. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Question 3

Do Type D and Musc Ravageur smell similar?

Accepted Answer

They share 5 notes and 6 accords, including Vanilla, Amber, Warm Spicy, Woody, Cinnamon. Musc Ravageur: Musc Ravageur wird in der Duftgemeinschaft als unverwechselbares, sorgfältig komponiertes Unisex-Parfum mit starker Haltbarkeit hochgeschätzt.

Question 4

Which lasts longer, Type D or Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

Musc Ravageur: Excellent performance and longevity Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Question 5

Which season suits Type D vs Musc Ravageur?

Accepted Answer

Type D scores highest for fall wear; Musc Ravageur scores highest for winter wear. Type D leans evening, Musc Ravageur leans evening.

Type D vs Musc Ravageur

Vergleichszusammenfassung

Gemeinsame Noten (5)

Einzigartig für Type D (5)

Einzigartig für Musc Ravageur (14)

Gemeinsame Akkorde (6)

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Community-Stimmungspuls — Musc Ravageur

Positiv

Negativ

Eigenschaft	Type D	Musc Ravageur
Marke	Henrik Vibskov	Frederic Malle
Jahr	2011	2000
Bewertung	4.63	4.21
Konzentration	—	—
Geschlecht	feminine	feminine
Gesamtnoten	10	19