Question 1

What's the difference between Eau de RubyLips and Noa?

Accepted Answer

Eau de RubyLips is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Salvador Dali (2005) dominated by Citrus accords. Noa is a feminine fragrance (marketed to women, though wearable by all) from Cacharel (1998) leaning on Floral accords. They share 5 accords: Floral, Powdery, White Floral, Fresh.

Question 2

Which is better, Eau de RubyLips or Noa?

Accepted Answer

By community rating, Eau de RubyLips scores 3.82/5 vs Noa at 3.88/5. Noa's standout strength: Fresh and clean scent reminiscent of soap and Nivea cream. The "better" choice depends on what you value — longevity, projection, season fit, or signature character.

Question 3

Do Eau de RubyLips and Noa smell similar?

Accepted Answer

They share 1 notes and 5 accords, including Floral, Powdery, White Floral, Fresh, Musky. Noa: Noa von Cacharel wird von der Community in guter Erinnerung behalten als ein nostalgisches, frisches Parfum mit einem sauberen, seifigen Profil, das an Dove-Seife und Nivea-Creme erinnert.

Question 4

Which lasts longer, Eau de RubyLips or Noa?

Accepted Answer

Noa: Moderate to weak longevity and projection Longevity varies by skin chemistry, concentration, and application method.

Question 5

Which season suits Eau de RubyLips vs Noa?

Accepted Answer

Eau de RubyLips scores highest for summer wear; Noa scores highest for all seasons wear. Eau de RubyLips leans daytime, Noa leans daytime.

Eau de RubyLips vs Noa

Vergleichszusammenfassung

Gemeinsame Noten (1)

Einzigartig für Eau de RubyLips (8)

Einzigartig für Noa (18)

Gemeinsame Akkorde (5)

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Community-Stimmungspuls — Noa

Positiv

Negativ

Eigenschaft	Eau de RubyLips	Noa
Marke	Salvador Dali	Cacharel
Jahr	2005	1998
Bewertung	3.82	3.88
Konzentration	—	—
Geschlecht	feminine	feminine
Gesamtnoten	9	19