11
Noty
8
Akordy
1
Parfumér
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Pánský
Vytvořil Jean Martel
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme by Rabanne is a Aromatic Fougere fragrance for men. Paco Rabanne Pour Homme was launched in 1973. The nose behind this fragrance is Jean Martel. Top notes are Rosemary, Clary Sage and Brazilian Rosewood; middle notes are Lavender, Geranium and Tonka Bean; base notes are Oakmoss, Honey, Musk, Amber and Tobacco.
Hlavní akordy
Vonné noty
Nejlepší období
70%
Zim
94%
Jar
58%
Lét
91%
Pod
Den a noc
100%
Den
60%
Noc
Olfaktorická pyramida
Od otevření po základ, intenzita založená na hlasování komunity.
Vrchní noty0 – 15 min
Srdcové noty15 min – 3 h
Otevření
Vývoj
Dozvuk
Vrchní noty0 – 15 min
Srdcové noty15 min – 3 h
Základní noty3 h – konec
Uživatelská hodnocení
4,060 hlasů
3.99
Miluju to
1.5k37%
Líbí se mi to
1.7k42%
OK
2536%
Nelíbí se mi
52513%
Nenávidím to
822%
Community Insights
PositiveBased on 21 community opinions from Reddit
7.8
/ 10 community score
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme is widely respected as a classic aromatic fougere that delivers a fresh, green, and genuinely masculine scent. While the community appreciates its heritage, longevity, and versatility, many note that modern formulations have weakened compared to vintage versions, and some find it projects an older aesthetic that may not appeal to younger audiences.
Strengths
- Classic, timeless aromatic fougere fragrance with green and fresh character
- Excellent longevity and performance, especially in older formulations
- Versatile for spring and summer wear with mature, confident vibe
- Great value proposition with 50+ year track record
Weaknesses
- Modern formulation perceived as weaker than vintage versions
- Often perceived as old-fashioned or reminiscent of older generations
- Some find it less interesting compared to similar classics like Azzaro Pour Homme
Best for
Spring and summer wearMature men seeking classic fragrancesOffice and business casual settingsMen who appreciate barbershop/traditional scents
AI-generated summary based on public community discussions. Not affiliated with the opinions' authors.
